4.8 Review

Toward highly thermally conductive all-carbon composites: Structure control

期刊

CARBON
卷 109, 期 -, 页码 575-597

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.08.059

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholars [51425306]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2016YFA0202302]
  3. State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [51633007]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51273144, 51373116, 51573125, 513111129]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City [14JCZDJC37900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

All-carbon composites are ideal heat-dissipating materials because they possess a high thermal conductivity (K), excellent mechanical properties, high temperature resistance, low coefficient of thermal expansion, outstanding chemical stability, and so on. The rapid development of science and technology has put forward the need for a higher K of all-carbon composites. Different from individual carbon materials, all-carbon composites have assembled structures, including the interface, orientation, and pores, which provide challenges and opportunities to improve the thermal and mechanical properties. Until now, a number of studies have reported on how to adjust the K of various all-carbon composites by controlling their microstructures and mesostructures. This review compiles recent research progress on highly thermally conductive all-carbon composites, including flexible carbon papers (carbon nanotube paper, graphene paper, exfoliated graphite paper), stiff carbon blocks (graphite block, carbon fiber block), and porous carbon foams (pitch-based carbon foam, graphene-based carbon foam, three dimensional graphene-carbon nanotube-based carbon foam). The key structures and their control methods related to their high K are outlined. Finally, the strategies and challenges in the development of highly thermally conductive all-carbon composites are presented. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据