4.4 Article

Multigene mutational profiling of biliary tract cancer is related to the pattern of recurrence in surgically resected patients

期刊

UPDATES IN SURGERY
卷 72, 期 1, 页码 119-128

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00718-5

关键词

Biliary tract cancers; Cholangiocarcinoma; Molecular profile; Gene mutations; Recurrence

类别

资金

  1. AIRC [12182, 6421]
  2. FP7 EU project CAM-PaC [602783]
  3. Italian Cancer Genome Project grant from the Italian Ministry of Research [FIRB-RBAP10AHJB]
  4. FIMP-Ministry of Health [CUP_J33G13000210001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between the mutational gene profile and recurrence in biliary tract cancers (BTC). A total of 103 specimens of patients with BTC, who underwent curative surgery in a single tertiary HPB surgery referral center from 1990 to 2012, were assessed for mutational status in 52 cancer-related genes. Considering the different types of BTC, the 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was 16.7% (median RFS 7 months) in gallbladder cancer, 42.9% (median RFS 26.4 months) in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 19.7% (median RFS 16.5 months) in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, p = 0.166. At the multivariate analysis including clinical, pathological, and molecular features, the factors independently related to RFS were radicality of surgery (OR 2.050, CI 1.104-3.807, p = 0.023), LN status (OR 1.835, CI 1.006-3.348, p = 0.048), mutational status of ARID1A (OR 2.566, CI 1.174-5.608, p = 0.018), and TP53 (OR 2.805, CI 4.432-5.496, p = 0.003). ARID1A mutation was associated with a local and systemic recurrence in the 43% and 29% of cases, respectively; and TP53 mutation was associated with a local and systemic recurrence in the 29% and 41% of cases. Moreover, TP53 was most commonly mutated in tumor of patients with early recurrence, p = 0.044. ARID1A and TP53 mutations seem to be related to poor outcome after surgery and may be considered molecular predictors of the biological aggressiveness in BTC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据