4.6 Article

Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Status in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Subjects

期刊

DIAGNOSTICS
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10030126

关键词

oxidative stress 1; inflammation 2; antioxidant enzymes 3; DNA damage 4; prostate cancer 5

资金

  1. United States Public Health Service [RO1CA115491, R21CA193080, R03CA186179]
  2. VA Merit Award [1I01BX002494]
  3. Case Comprehensive Cancer Center [P30 CA43703]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The oxidant/antioxidant balance has been implicated in the pathophysiology of prostate cancer. We investigated oxidative damage and antioxidant status in high-risk prostate cancer subjects. Reduced glutathione (GSH) levels were measured in erythrocytes, 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) in leukocytes and plasma levels of catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), glutathione reductase (GSH-R), glutathione S-transferase (GST), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and lipid peroxide products were measured in high-risk and age-matched healthy subjects. Serum PSA levels were significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in high-risk subjects, whereas GST (p < 0.0001) and GSH (p < 0.002) were hig her in healthy controls. Levels of 8-OHdG, an oxidized nucleoside of DNA, were significantly increased (p < 0.0001) in high-risk subjects. No marked difference in the levels of CAT (p = 0.237), GSH-Px (p = 0.74), GSH-R (p = 0.344), SOD (p = 0.109), and lipid peroxide products (p = 0129) were observed between two groups. Pearson's correlation between GST and PSA (r = -0.69 (p < 0.0001)), GST and 8-OHdG (r = -0.62 (p < 0.0004)), GSH and 8-OHdG (r = -0.39 (p = 0.038)), and CAT and GSH-Px (r = -0.33 (p = 0.04)) were found to be negatively correlated, whereas 8-OHdG and PSA were positively associated (r = 0.57 (p < 0.002). These results indicate a significant role of oxidative damage in prostate carcinogenesis, particularly during the early stages of development. In conclusion, our data support the importance of antioxidant defense as a valuable diagnostic and/or prognostic marker in prostate cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据