4.6 Article

Causes of Large Increases in Atmospheric Ammonia in the Last Decade across North America

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 4, 期 26, 页码 22133-22142

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03284

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program in China [2016YFC0200500]
  2. NSFC [41776086]
  3. Air Pollutants Program of Environment and Climate Change Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Decadal trends of atmospheric ammonia (NH3) and their potential causes were explored through the analysis of monitored data collected at 15 sites in the United States and 7 sites in Canada. Large percentage increases in the annual average concentration of atmospheric NH3, for example, >100% at 6 sites and 40-100% at 10 sites, were observed over the most recent 8-13 year period. In contrast, a decrease or a narrow variation in NH3 emissions was reported at the state or provincial level in both countries during the same period. Decreased emissions of SO2 and NOx across North America in the past decade would have reduced the chemical loss of atmospheric NH3 to form particulate NH4+. Such a chemical mechanism was verified through regression analysis at about half of the monitored sites, where the increasing trends in atmospheric NH3 were partially explained by the reduced NH4+. Excluding the reduced contribution from this chemical loss to generate the adjusted annual NH3 concentration through two approaches, no decreasing trends can be obtained to align those in emissions at most sites, implying that other factors also contributed to the increase in the annual NH3 concentration. Correlation analysis results implied that enhanced drought conditions and increased ambient temperatures also likely contributed to the increasing trend in the annual NH3 concentration at some sites. The large percentage increases in the annual NH3 concentration cannot be fully explained by all the identified causes, leading to oppugning the reality of the decrease in NH3 emissions reported across North America in the recent decade.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据