4.7 Article

Physiological Response of Miscanthus x giganteus to Plant Growth Regulators in Nutritionally Poor Soil

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants9020194

关键词

Miscanthus x giganteus; leaf fluorescence; nutritionally poor post-military soil; plant physiology; plant stress

资金

  1. NATO Science for Peace and Security Programme [MYP G4687]
  2. J.E. Purkyn.e University [UJEP-IGA-TC-2019-44-01-2, UJEP-SGS-2017-44-003-3]
  3. [LM2015073]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Miscanthus x giganteus (Mxg) is a promising second-generation biofuel crop with high production of energetic biomass. Our aim was to determine the level of plant stress of Mxg grown in poor quality soils using non-invasive physiological parameters and to test whether the stress could be reduced by application of plant growth regulators (PGRs). Plant fitness was quantified by measuring of leaf fluorescence using 24 indexes to select the most suitable fluorescence indicators for quantification of this type of abiotic stress. Simultaneously, visible stress signs were observed on stems and leaves and differences in variants were revealed also by microscopy of leaf sections. Leaf fluorescence analysis, visual observation and changes of leaf anatomy revealed significant stress in all studied subjects compared to those cultivated in good quality soil. Besides commonly used F-v/F-m (potential photosynthetic efficiency) and P.I. (performance index), which showed very low sensitivity, we suggest other fluorescence parameters (like dissipation, DIo/RC) for revealing finer differences. We can conclude that measurement of leaf fluorescence is a suitable method for revealing stress affecting Mxg in poor soils. However, none of investigated parameters proved significant positive effect of PGRs on stress reduction. Therefore, direct improvement of soil quality by fertilization should be considered for stress reduction and improving the biomass quality in this type of soils.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据