4.7 Article

Steady-State Levels of Cytokinins and Their Derivatives May Serve as a Unique Classifier of Arabidopsis Ecotypes

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants9010116

关键词

abscisic acid; cytokinins; cytokinin glucosides; cytokinin metabolism; indole-3-acetic acid; single nucleotide polymorphism

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (National Program for Sustainability I) [LO1204]
  2. European Regional Development Fund-Project SINGING PLANT [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_026/0008446]
  3. Masaryk University
  4. Ministry of Education, Youths and Sports of the CR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We determined steady-state (basal) endogenous levels of three plant hormones (abscisic acid, cytokinins and indole-3-acetic acid) in a collection of thirty different ecotypes of Arabidopsis that represent a broad genetic variability within this species. Hormone contents were analysed separately in plant shoots and roots after 21 days of cultivation on agar plates in a climate-controlled chamber. Using advanced statistical and machine learning methods, we tested if basal hormonal levels can be considered a unique ecotype-specific classifier. We also explored possible relationships between hormone levels and the prevalent environmental conditions in the site of origin for each ecotype. We found significant variations in basal hormonal levels and their ratios in both root and shoot among the ecotypes. We showed the prominent position of cytokinins (CK) among the other hormones. We found the content of CK and CK metabolites to be a reliable ecotype-specific identifier. Correlation with the mean temperature at the site of origin and the large variation in basal hormonal levels suggest that the high variability may potentially be in response to environmental factors. This study provides a starting point for ecotype-specific genetic maps of the CK metabolic and signalling network to explore its contribution to the adaptation of plants to local environmental conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据