4.5 Article

Flumazenil-Insensitive Benzodiazepine Effects in Recombinant alpha beta and Neuronal GABA(A) Receptors

期刊

BRAIN SCIENCES
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10030150

关键词

diazepam; benzodiazepine; GABA(A) receptors; alpha beta receptors; benzodiazepine binding sites

资金

  1. Beijing Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gamma-aminobutyric acid, type A (GABA(A)) receptors are complex heterogeneous pentamers with various drug binding sites. Several lines of evidence suggest that benzodiazepines modulate certain GABA(A) receptors in a flumazenil-insensitive manner, possibly via binding sites other than the classical ones. However, GABA(A) receptor subtypes that contain non-classical benzodiazepine binding sites are not systemically studied. The present study investigated the high-concentration effects of three benzodiazepines and their sensitivity to flumazenil on different recombinant (alpha 1 beta 2, alpha 2 beta 2, alpha 3 beta 2, alpha 4 beta 2, alpha 5 beta 2 and alpha 1 beta 3) and native neuronal GABA(A) receptors using the whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology technique. The classical benzodiazepine diazepam (200 mu mol/L) and midazolam (200 mu mol/L) produced flumazenil-insensitive effects on alpha 1 beta 2 receptor, whereas the imidazopyridine zolpidem failed to modulate the receptor. Flumazenil-insensitive effects of diazepam were also observed on the alpha 2 beta 2, alpha 3 beta 2 and alpha 5 beta 2, but not alpha 4 beta 2 receptors. Unlike beta 2-containing receptors, the alpha 1 beta 3 receptor was insensitive to diazepam. Moreover, the diazepam (200 mu mol/L) effects on some cortical neurons could not be fully antagonized by flumazenil (200 mu mol/L). These findings suggested that the non-classical (flumazenil-insensitive) benzodiazepine effects depended on certain receptor subtypes and benzodiazepine structures and may be important for designing of subtype- or binding site- specific drugs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据