4.7 Article

Performance assessment of aerobic granulation for the post treatment of anaerobic effluents

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eti.2019.100588

关键词

Aerobic granulation; Anaerobic effluents; Sewage; Sequencing batch reactor (SBR); Scanning electron microscopy (SEM); Up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) process

资金

  1. Department of Science & Technology, (DST) [DST/TM/WTI/2K15/120 (G)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Present study investigates the formation of aerobic granular biomass and its comparative performance in treatment of anaerobic effluents using two lab scale sequencing batch reactors (SBR), (Reactor 1 and 2) fed with medium strength synthetic wastewater and anaerobic effluent respectively. The granulation was better in reactor 1 with biomass concentration of 7014 mg/L while in reactor 2 it could reach only 3910 mg/L. Reactor 1 showed good organic and nitrogen removal performance. The COD removal efficiency in reactor 1 was more than 90% (average similar to 94 +/- 2%) reaching to a maximum of 98% with influent concentration of 1400 +/- 12 mg/L. While in reactor 2, it was only 55 +/- 9% reaching to a maximum of 64% with influent concentration of 213 +/- 47 mg/L. Total nitrogen removal efficiency with influent of 140 +/- 3 mg/L in reactor 1 was more than 90% compared to average removal efficiency of 78 +/- 7% with influent of 84 +/- 25 mg/L in reactor 2. Reactor 1 showed better nitrate removal of 91 +/- 9%(influent nitrate concentration of 53 +/- 6 mg/L) while as reactor 2 showed better ammonia removal of 87 +/- 25% with influent concentration of 67 +/- 29 mg/L. Sludge characterization by Scanning Electron Microscopy and Fourier Transforms Infrared Spectroscopy revealed bacterial morphologies of rod, coccus and filament coexisted in the granules. The preliminary findings in this study may supplement insights about application of aerobic granulation in post treatment of anaerobic effluents. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据