4.7 Article

Experimental study on the leaching performance of U(VI) solidified by uranium tailing cement with different admixtures and ratios

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eti.2019.100506

关键词

Uranium tailings; Cement solidified waste form; Fly ash; Slag powder; U(VI); Leaching performance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11475081, 11875164]
  2. Double First Class Construct Program of USC [2017SLY05]
  3. Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation For Postgraduate, China [CX20190726]
  4. Open Fund Project of Hunan Cooperative Innovation Center for Nuclear Fuel Cycle Technology Equipment [2019KFZ01]
  5. Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province, China [17B228]
  6. Hunan Province Engineering Technology Research Center of Uranium Tailings Treatment Technology [2018YKZX1004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research into radionuclide leaching behavior in the treatment of low-level radioactive waste solidification has been a widespread concern. To study the leaching performance of U(VI) in solidified bodies in simulated groundwater environment, fly ash and slag powder were mixed in different ratios with uranium tailing cement. The U(VI) leaching results from solidified bodies prepared using pure Portland cement, fly ash, slag powder, fly ash, and slag powder were compared and analyzed. The results showed that the leaching performance of solidified U(VI) decreased with increased pH, but the effects were different and had similar inhibitory effects on U(VI) leaching in neutral and alkaline environments. The variation trend of leaching concentrations was also different with admixture changes. When fly ash was added, the U(VI) leaching concentration trend first increased, then decreased, and finally became stable. However, there was no increasing process between pure Portland cement and slag powder, which might have been due to the different admixture chemical compositions. Comparing the leaching rate at 42 d in a neutral environment, it was found that the leaching rate of 15% slag powder was the lowest, at 2.47296 x 10(-5) cm/d. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据