4.8 Article

Removal of airborne sub-3 nm particles using fibrous filters and granular activated carbons

期刊

CARBON
卷 104, 期 -, 页码 125-132

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.03.060

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Minnesota [3000 11137 05306727]
  2. A.O. Smith Water Products Company
  3. BASF Corporation
  4. Boeing Company
  5. China Yancheng Environmental Protection Science and Technology City
  6. Cummins Filtration Inc.
  7. Donaldson Company Inc.
  8. Entegris Inc.
  9. Ford Motor Company
  10. Guangxi Wat Yuan Filtration System Co., Ltd.
  11. H.B. Fuller Company
  12. Mann+Hummel GmbH
  13. MSP Corporation
  14. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd
  15. Shigematsu Works Co., Ltd.
  16. TSI Inc.
  17. W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
  18. Xinxiang Shengda Filtration Technology Co., Ltd

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The filtration efficiencies of fibrous filters and a granular activated carbon (GAC) for sub-3 nm particles were investigated, which were not previously well-studied. The sub-3 nm particles were classified by a high resolution differential mobility analyzer and measured by an aerosol electrometer. The penetration of sub-3 nm particles through the GAC was well-matched with the previous results using 3-30 nm particles. All tested fibrous filters showed 100% filtration efficiency for the sub-3 nm particles and were still sufficiently powerful to eliminate nanoparticles in the air down to 1.5 rim. Although the GAC showed lower filtration efficiency than the fibrous filters, GACs can be used to reduce the concentration of both gas molecules and nanoparticles simultaneously with a low pressure drop. The single sphere efficiency of the GAC for the sub-3 nm particles was a power-law of the Peclet number, and the exponent was 0.35. The exponent was higher than that for 3-30 nm particles, 0.5. Moreover, the exponent for 1.5-30 nm particles was 0.43, which was the same as that of the single fiber efficiency observed by others. This requires a new particle filtration model of porous filter media such as GACs. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据