4.8 Article

The core-shell internal nanostructure of soot - A criterion to model soot maturity

期刊

CARBON
卷 100, 期 -, 页码 508-536

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.01.022

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. BioFuelNet Canada
  3. NSERC Vanier program
  4. department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at the University of Toronto
  5. Canada Foundation for Innovation under Compute Canada
  6. Government of Ontario
  7. Ontario Research Fund-Research Excellence
  8. University of Toronto

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel model called Surface Shell Formation (SSF) is developed which predicts soot maturity based on the equilibrium nanostructure of poly aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) inside soot primary particles. The characteristic isotropic core-graphitic shell internal nanostructure of soot primary particles is used to distinguish nascent from mature soot primary particles. A new sectional soot model is developed to track particle Hydrogen to Carbon (H/C) ratio and the growth in the molecular weight of PAHs inside soot primary particles. An independent Arrhenius term describes particle dehydrogenation/carbonization. It is shown that soot maturity depends on both particle size and H/C ratio. Graphitic shell formation in mature soot particles is related to the surface PAHs that change configuration from edge on surface for nascent soot to face on surface for mature soot particles. The new model is validated against experimental data for laminar premixed, partially premixed and diffusion flames. The SSF model addresses the two major limitations of the current soot modeling approaches. First, it predicts H/C ratio of soot particles by considering soot carbonization. Second, it distinguishes nascent soot from mature soot primary particles based on the internal nanostructure of soot primary particles and the presence of the graphitic shell. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据