4.8 Article

Electrically functional 3D-architectured graphene/SiC composites

期刊

CARBON
卷 100, 期 -, 页码 318-328

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.12.103

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Government [MAT2012-32944, PIE 201360E063]
  2. CSIC [MAT2012-32944, PIE 201360E063]
  3. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) through projects CICECO-Aveiro Institute of Materials - national funds through the FCT/MEC [FCT UID/CTM/50011/2013]
  4. FEDER
  5. FCT [IF/01174/2013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lightweight, three-dimensional (3D) cellular structures of graphene/silicon carbide (SiC) showing very low densities (<1.6 g cm(-3)) as compared to the dense skeleton (<3.2 g cm(-3)) have been fabricated by a filament-based printing technique known as Robocasting. These scaffolds have been assembled from pseudoplastic inks containing homogeneous mixtures of SiC ceramic powders and up to 20 vol.% of graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs), and densified by pressureless spark plasma sintering. The electrical conductivity (sigma) of the scaffolds shows certain anisotropy with the structure orientation and increases with the GNPs volume fraction. In this way, sigma values of up to 611 S m(-1) for the longitudinal and 273 S m(-1) for the transverse orientations of the structures relative to the extruded rods are achieved. First attempts to model the electrical behavior of robocast scaffolds using both analytical and finite-element methods are described. The models provide a correct description of general trends in the conductivity and anisotropy, and are expected to be useful as a first approach to anticipate the trends of other properties, as the thermal conductivity, of such complex multifunctional cellular materials, thus narrowing the experimental workload. Scaffolds tested under compression show crushing strengths in the range of 10-50 MPa, which increase with the relative density of the skeletons. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据