4.7 Article

Adsorption performance of hydroxyapatite with different crystalline and porous structure towards metal ions in multicomponent solution

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100963

关键词

Hydroxyapatite; Adsorption mechanism; Metal ions; Crystallisation inhibitors; Water treatment

资金

  1. State Research Programme [1.05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydroxyapatite (HA) is a well-known and widely used efficient adsorbent for toxic metal ion and radionuclide removal from wastewater. However, the relationship between the structural parameters of HA and its adsorption characteristics (capacity, selectivity, kinetic parameters) requires in-depth study. In this study, HA with different crystalline and porous structures was obtained using crystallisation inhibitors of different natures, and their adsorption properties in a multicomponent solution (Cd2+, Co2+, Cu2+, Fe3+, Ni2+, Pb2+ and Zn2+) was investigated. Using low doses of inhibitors (Mg2+ ions and hydroxyethylenediphosphonic acid) had a positive effect on HA adsorption characteristics, due to their low degree of crystallinity (amorphous calcium phosphate) and a well-developed porous structure (ABET up to 200-240m(2) g(-1)). The adsorption capacity of the HA samples in relation to the Cd2+, Cu2+, Fe3+, Pb2+, Zn2+ ions and their simultaneous presence in the solution varied from 0.13 to 1.28 mmol g(-1). The achieved residual concentration of Pb2+, Zn2+ and Cu2+ ions was below the maximum concentration limit, and the ions of Fe3+ were almost equal to zero. The highest adsorption of Co2+ and Ni2+ ions was observed for HA obtained in the presence of Mg2+. HA prepared with HEPD has been shown to have the highest efficiency towards Cd2+, Cu2+, Fe3+, Pb2+, Zn2+ ions. The adsorption kinetic data fitted well with the pseudo-second-order model. It was shown that, depending on the composition and structural characteristics of the prepared HA, ion-exchange and dissolution-precipitation were the two main mechanisms in their interaction with metal ions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据