4.6 Article

Generation of a Collision Cross Section Library for Multi-Dimensional Plant Metabolomics Using UHPLC-Trapped Ion Mobility-MS/MS

期刊

METABOLITES
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/metabo10010013

关键词

collision cross section; CCS; trapped ion mobility spectrometry; TIMS; mass spectrometry; natural products; adducts; metabolomics

资金

  1. University of Missouri, Department of Biochemistry and Bond Life Sciences Center
  2. Bruker Daltonik Gmbh, Bremen, Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The utility of metabolomics is well documented; however, its full scientific promise has not yet been realized due to multiple technical challenges. These grand challenges include accurate chemical identification of all observable metabolites and the limiting depth-of-coverage of current metabolomics methods. Here, we report a combinatorial solution to aid in both grand challenges using UHPLC-trapped ion mobility spectrometry coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-TIMS-TOF-MS). TIMS offers additional depth-of-coverage through increased peak capacities realized with the multi-dimensional UHPLC-TIMS separations. Metabolite identification confidence is simultaneously enhanced by incorporating orthogonal collision cross section (CCS) data matching. To facilitate metabolite identifications, we created a CCS library of 146 plant natural products. This library was generated using TIMS with N-2 drift gas to record the (CCSN2)-C-TIMS of plant natural products with a high degree of reproducibility; i.e., average RSD = 0.10%. The robustness of (CCSN2)-C-TIMS data matching was tested using authentic standards spiked into complex plant extracts, and the precision of CCS measurements were determined to be independent of matrix affects. The utility of the UHPLC-TIMS-TOF-MS/MS in metabolomics was then demonstrated using extracts from the model legume Medicago truncatula and metabolites were confidently identified based on retention time, accurate mass, molecular formula, and CCS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据