4.7 Article

Facile synthesis of nanoparticles anchored on honeycomb-like MnCo2S4 nanostructures as a binder-free electroactive material for supercapacitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 27, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2019.101159

关键词

Honeycomb-like; Chemical bath deposition method; Supercapacitors; Specific capacity

资金

  1. Basic Research Laboratory through the National Research Foundations of Korea - Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning [NRF-2015R1A4A1041584]
  2. UAEU Program for Advanced Research (UPAR) [31S312]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, nanoparticles filled with honeycomb-like MnCo2S4 (MCS) nanostructures are prepared successfully on the surface of nickel foam using a simple and cost-effective chemical bath deposition method and can be used as a promising electroactive material for high performance supercapacitor applications. The electrochemical behavior of the as-prepared electroactive materials was studied by the cyclic voltammetry, galvanostatic charge/discharge, electron impedance spectroscopy. The crystalline phase, structure, morphology and composition of the as-prepared electroactive materials were analyzed by X-ray diffraction, field-emission scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The performance of the as-prepared electroactive materials was carried out in a 3 M KOH electrolyte in the three-electrode system. The unique nanoparticle structures enable and provides the more efficient pathways for the rapid mobility of electrons and ions. As a result, the as-prepared binder-free MCS electrode exhibits a higher specific capacity of 129.7 mA h g(-1) at 1 A g(-1), superior rate capability of 88.51% after 4000 cycles and excellent cycling stability of 87.81% respectively, which are much higher than that of MCO electrode. These results reveal that the as synthesized MCS electrode found to be the most promising candidate for high-performance supercapacitor applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据