4.7 Article

Optimization of entropy generation in flow of micropolar mixed convective magnetite (Fe3O4) ferroparticle over a vertical plate

期刊

ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 58, 期 4, 页码 1461-1470

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2019.11.019

关键词

Micropolar fluid; Mixed convection; Entropy generation; Magnetite-Fe3O4; Keller-box technique

资金

  1. Theoretical and Computational Science (TaCS) Center under Computational and Applied Science for Smart Innovation Research Cluster (CLASSIC), Faculty of Science, KMUTT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, a comprehensive analysis is performed for the micropolar magnetite-Fe3O4 Ferro-liquid from a vertical plate using the mixed convective flow. An entropy analysis is executed to determine the disorder of the magnetite particles and micropolar fluid. To analyze the buoyancy effects, results are confined for opposing and assisting flows. A mathematical model is constructed, that is based upon the micro rotation vector, momentum equation and energy equations. Entropy generation process and all related effects are also considered for said model. By using the similarity transformation, obtained PDE's transmuted into the system of nonlinear ODE's and then numerical simulation is performed by Keller box technique. Results of concerned influential parameters on temperature, velocity, microrotation velocity within the domain of the constraint are demonstrated through graphs. In order to check the performance of heat transfer and flow behavior at the plate, the coefficient of the skin friction and the Nusselt number are also analyzed. Results reveal that the multiple results are attained in the opposing flow while the single result is appearing in the assisting flow. Moreover, the ferroparticle volume fraction accelerates the boundary-layer separation, while the micropolar parameter delays the boundary-layer separation. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据