4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Comparison of different lipid extraction procedures applied to three microalgal species

期刊

ENERGY REPORTS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 477-482

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2019.09.011

关键词

Arthrospira platensis; Biodiesel; Biorefinery; Chlorella zofingiensis; Lipid extraction; Microalgae; Phaeodactylum tricornutum

资金

  1. FCT/MCTES, Portugal [IF/01093/2014/CP1249/CT0003, IF/01093/2014, SFRH/BPD/112003/2015]
  2. Center for Innovation in Engineering and Industrial Technology - CIETI, Portugal [UID/EQU/00305/2013]
  3. Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy - LEPABE - FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC), Portugal [UID/EQU/00511/2019]
  4. FEDER, Portugal through COMPETE2020-POCI [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006939, UID/EQU/00511/2013]
  5. FCT, Portugal
  6. Project LEPABE-2-ECO-INNOVATION - Norte Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), Portugal, under PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) [NORTE-01-0145FEDER-000005]
  7. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [IF/01093/2014/CP1249/CT0003] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The increase in the world's energy demand has contributed to the emergence of new sustainable energy sources, such as microalgae, with their great potential to provide biofuels and other high value co-products for the food and health's markets. However, current biorefinery methodologies are either too complex to extract the targeted components such as high-value products, or require solvents with toxicity for humans and the environment. This work aims to evaluate different lipid extraction approaches applied to three microalgal species: Chlorella zofingiensis, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, and Arthrospira platensis, while employing less toxic and more economical solvents for the lipids extraction. Experimental results showed a promising outcome to tune current biorefinery methodologies, enhancing product yield as well as decreasing potential hazards. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据