4.6 Review

A comprehensive review of Thermoelectric Generators: Technologies and common applications

期刊

ENERGY REPORTS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 264-287

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2019.12.011

关键词

Thermoelectric generator; MEMS/LTCC technologies; Wearable devices; WSNs; Biomedical; Vehicle engine; Aerospace

资金

  1. German academic exchange service (DAAD) organization, Germany
  2. German Research Foundation (DFG)
  3. Open Access Publication Fund of the Technische Universitat Ilmenau

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Power costs increasing, environmental pollution and global warming are issues that we are dealing with in the present time. To reduce their effects, scientists are focusing on improving energy harvesting-based power generators. Thermoelectric generators (TEGs) have demonstrated their ability to directly convert thermal energy into an electrical one via the Seebeck effect. Also, they are environmentally friendly because they do not contain chemical products, they operate silently because they do not have mechanical structures and/or moving parts, and they can be fabricated on many types of substrates like silicon, polymers, and ceramics. Furthermore, TEGs are position-independent, present a long operating lifetime and are suitable for integration into bulk and flexible devices. This paper presents in-depth analysis of TEGs, starting by an extensive description of their working principle, types (planar, vertical and mixed), used materials, figure of merit, improvement techniques including different thermoelectric materials arrangement (conventional, segmented and cascaded), and used technologies and substrates types (silicon, ceramics and polymers). This manuscript also describes the exploitation of TEGs in various fields starting from low-power applications (medical and wearable devices, IoT: internet of things, and WSN: wireless sensor network) to high-power applications (industrial electronics, automotive engines, and aerospace). (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据