4.7 Review

Use of Computational Modeling to Study Joint Degeneration: A Review

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00093

关键词

in silico modeling; bone remodeling; cartilage degeneration; finite element modeling; gene regulatory network; data driven approach

资金

  1. European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (FP/2014-2020)/ERC [772418]
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Marie Sklodowska-Curie [721432]
  3. Collen-Francqui Foundation
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [772418] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteoarthritis (OA), a degenerative joint disease, is the most common chronic condition of the joints, which cannot be prevented effectively. Computational modeling of joint degradation allows to estimate the patient-specific progression of OA, which can aid clinicians to estimate the most suitable time window for surgical intervention in osteoarthritic patients. This paper gives an overview of the different approaches used to model different aspects of joint degeneration, thereby focusing mostly on the knee joint. The paper starts by discussing how OA affects the different components of the joint and how these are accounted for in the models. Subsequently, it discusses the different modeling approaches that can be used to answer questions related to OA etiology, progression and treatment. These models are ordered based on their underlying assumptions and technologies: musculoskeletal models, Finite Element models, (gene) regulatory models, multiscale models and data-driven models (artificial intelligence/machine learning). Finally, it is concluded that in the future, efforts should be made to integrate the different modeling techniques into a more robust computational framework that should not only be efficient to predict OA progression but also easily allow a patient's individualized risk assessment as screening tool for use in clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据