4.7 Article

Blockade of EGFR improves responsiveness to PD-1 blockade in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer

期刊

SCIENCE IMMUNOLOGY
卷 5, 期 43, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aav3937

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [17H06162, 17J09900, 17K18388]
  2. Project for Cancer Research
  3. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) [16cm0106301h0002]
  4. National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund [28-A-7, 31-A-7]
  5. Naito Foundation
  6. Takeda Foundation
  7. SGH Foundation
  8. Novartis Research Grant
  9. Kobayashi Foundation for Cancer Research
  10. Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The clinical efficacy of anti-PD-1 (programmed cell death-1) monoclonal antibody (mAb) against cancers with oncogenic driver gene mutations, which often harbor a low tumor mutation burden, is variable, suggesting different contributions of each driver mutation to immune responses. Here, we investigated the immunological phenotypes in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung adenocarcinomas, for which anti-PD-1 mAb is largely ineffective. Whereas EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinomas had a noninflamed TME, CD4(+) effector regulatory T cells, which are generally present in the inflamed TME, showed high infiltration. The EGFR signal activated cJun/cJun N-terminal kinase and reduced interferon regulatory factor-1; the former increased CCL22, which recruits CD4(+) regulatory T cells, and the latter decreased CXCL10 and CCL5, which induce CD8(+) T cell infiltration. The EGFR inhibitor erlotinib decreased CD4(+) effector regulatory T cells infiltration in the TME and in combination with anti-PD-1 mAb showed better antitumor effects than either treatment alone. Our results suggest that EGFR inhibitors when used in conjunction with anti-PD-1 mAb could increase the efficacy of immunotherapy in lung adenocarcinomas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据