4.7 Article

Synthesis and characterization of amylose-zinc inclusion complexes

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 137, 期 -, 页码 314-320

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.100

关键词

Amy lose; Inclusion complex; Potato starch; Pullulanase; Zinc

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21376097]
  2. program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-13-0212]
  3. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [S2013010012318]
  4. Key Project of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province [2013B090500013]
  5. Key Project of Science and Technology of Guangzhou City [2014J4500012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amylose-zinc inclusion complexes were synthesized using zinc chloride and amylose, which is obtained by completely debranching potato starch using pullulanase. Based on the zinc content (W-Zn) and zinc conversion (C-Zn), the reaction parameters, such as reaction time, reaction temperature, pH value and amount of zinc chloride added, were evaluated. The W-Zn and C-Zn of the zinc-loaded amylose, which was prepared under optimal conditions, were 128 mg/g and 82.05%, respectively. The Raman spectra showed that amylose formed a special single helix structure after complexing with zinc. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) and Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) results showed that starch and zinc could formate the inclusion complexes. Moreover, the formation of amylose-zinc inclusion complexes was confirmed by the results of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and C-13 CP/MAS NMR, which suggests that zinc was mainly coordinated to the oxygen atoms of the glucose unit, 6-CH2OH. Thermal properties of the complexes were influenced by the zincatation process. This approach not only enlarged the number of fields for amylose use but also exhibited the extensive potential applications for zinc nutrition fortifier research. The study suggested that potato amylose might be a good carrier of zinc for nutritional supplementation purposes. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据