4.3 Article

Experimental study on the monotonic shear strength of GM/CCL composite liner interface

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL GEOTECHNICS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 19-31

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1680/jenge.19.00014

关键词

geosynthetics; landslides; strength & testing of materials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an experimental study on the interface shear behavior between smooth and textured geomembranes and compacted clay liners. The shear strength was found to be mainly driven by the normal stress level and had minimal influence from the displacement rate. The residual shear strength of the textured geomembrane/compacted clay liner interface was even higher than the peak shear strength of the smooth geomembrane/compacted clay liner interface at all normal stress levels.
The interface shear strength between a geomembrane (GM) and a compacted clay liner (CCL) or a geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) is of great importance for landfill stability analysis. An experimental study of the interface shear behaviour between a smooth GM (GMS) or a textured GM (GMX) and a CCL is presented in this paper. A series of monotonic shear tests was conducted using a large direct-shear apparatus. Peak and residual shear strength parameters were obtained by linear fitting of the experimental data. The shear strength of both GMS/CCL and GMX/CCL interfaces was mainly driven by the normal stress level, while the displacement rate had very little influence on the interface shear strength. The residual shear strength of the GMX/CCL interface was even higher than the peak shear strength of the GMS/CCL interface at all normal stress levels. The GM/CCL interface showed considerably higher shear strength over the GM/GCL interface; the residual strength of the GM/CCL interface was even higher than the peak strength of the GM/GCL interface at all normal stress levels. The results presented in this paper are useful for the preliminary design of landfill composite liner systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据