4.5 Article

Shades of blue: non-invasive spectroscopic investigations of Maya blue pigments. From laboratory mock-ups to Mesoamerican codices

期刊

HERITAGE SCIENCE
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGEROPEN
DOI: 10.1186/s40494-019-0345-z

关键词

Maya blue; Organic-inorganic hybrid pigment; Indigo-clay interactions; Host framework; UV-vis reflection spectroscopy; DFT calculations; Mesoamerican codices

资金

  1. Horizon 2020 Programme of the EU (IPERION CH Grant) [654028]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Maya blue is a hybrid pigment where an organic component, indigo, is incorporated in a porous clay. Despite its widespread use in the Mesoamerican artistic production and numerous studies devoted to understand the type of interactions between indigo and the host framework, its technology has not been completely unravelled yet. In this study portable non-invasive UV-vis reflection spectroscopy is proposed as a robust method for in situ investigation of Maya blue pigments. Laboratory mock-ups of powder Maya blue have been prepared employing different synthesis procedures (varying the nature of: clays, indigo-clay ratios, heating temperatures and time). The goodness of the prepared Maya blue samples-namely the occurrence of indigo-clay interactions-have been probed by micro-Raman spectroscopy and related UV-vis spectral markers have been identified. DFT calculations as well have been performed to deeply explain UV-vis profiles. The set of spectral markers have been finally exploited to interpret spectra recorded on Mesoamerican pictorial codices, through a multi-technique approach based on exploring the UV-Vis properties of the blue paint supported by the FT-IR vibrational study of the inorganic clays. The characterization of blue colours on pre-Hispanic and colonial Mesoamerican codices contribute to a better understanding of the compositional variability of these painting materials and to point out the existence of different technological traditions of colour preparation in ancient Mesoamerica.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据