4.5 Article

Influence of nitrogen application on wheat crop performance, soil properties, greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprint in central Bhutan

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT
卷 32, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.envdev.2019.100469

关键词

Biomass; Carbon: nitrogen ratio; Grain yield; Nutrient management; Rice-wheat system; GHG emissions

资金

  1. Renewable Natural Resources - Research and Development Centre, Bajo
  2. Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Forests, Royal Government of Bhutan, Thimphu

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Bhutan, wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is an important staple crop and its productivity is low due to poor soil fertility and inadequate external inputs. Hence, effects of four levels of nitrogen (N) [0, 50, 80 and 100 kg N ha(-1)] on wheat crop and soil properties were examined for two consecutive years (2012 and 2013) in a rice-wheat rotation. The experiment was set up in a randomized complete block design and the treatments replicated three times. In addition, greenhouse gas (GHG) emission was analyzed both per unit area and per kilogram of wheat grain to determine the emission-intense sources. Data were subjected to analysis of variance. Among the treatments, 100 kg N ha(-1) had the largest effect on grain yield and dry biomass and on plant height. Significant correlations were detected for the N rates vs. dry biomass. However, correlations between N rates vs. soil N, C:N ratio and pH were significant for 2013 only. The average GHG emissions were 1114.2 kg CO(2)e ha(-1) and 0.533 kg CO(2)e kg(-1) grain and the emissions per hectare were highly influenced by N rates whereas the emissions per kilogram of grain were influenced by grain yield. We concluded that, in Bhutan, the application of N-fertilizer significantly enhanced wheat productivity and soil health at N rates of >= 50 kg N ha(-1). Further, the results indicated potentials to increase wheat yield with lower GHG emissions through improved N management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据