4.7 Article

The Biological Potential Hidden in Inclusion Bodies

期刊

PHARMACEUTICS
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12020157

关键词

inclusion body; polymeric micelle; stability; matrix metalloproteinase-9; in vitro; in vivo

资金

  1. INIA (MINECO, Spain) [RTA2012-00028-C02, RTA2015-00064-C02]
  2. AGAUR [2017SGR-229]
  3. Research Foundation of Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen)
  4. CERCA Programme (Generalitat de Catalunya)
  5. European Social Fund
  6. INIA (FPI-INIA, MINECO)
  7. Asociacion Espanola Contra el Cancer (AECC)
  8. INIA (DOC-INIA)
  9. ICREA ACADEMIA award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inclusion bodies (IBs) are protein nanoclusters obtained during recombinant protein production processes, and several studies have demonstrated their potential as biomaterials for therapeutic protein delivery. Nevertheless, IBs have been, so far, exclusively sifted by their biological activity in vitro to be considered in further protein-based treatments in vivo. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) protein, which has an important role facilitating the migration of immune cells, was used as model protein. The MMP-9 IBs were compared with their soluble counterpart and with MMP-9 encapsulated in polymeric-based micelles (PM) through ionic and covalent binding. The soluble MMP-9 and the MMP-9-ionic PM showed the highest activity values in vitro. IBs showed the lowest activity values in vitro, but the specific activity evolution in 50% bovine serum at room temperature proved that they were the most stable format. The data obtained with the use of an air-pouch mouse model showed that MMP-9 IBs presented the highest in vivo activity compared to the soluble MMP-9, which was associated only to a low and a transitory peak of activity. These results demonstrated that the in vivo performance is the addition of many parameters that did not always correlate with the in vitro behavior of the protein of interest, becoming especially relevant at evaluating the potential of IBs as a protein-based nanomaterial for therapeutic purposes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据