4.7 Article

S-protected thiolated hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC): Novel mucoadhesive excipient with improved stability

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 144, 期 -, 页码 514-521

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.02.075

关键词

Hydroxyethyl cellulose; Enzymatic degradation; Mucoadhesion; Thiolation; Thiomer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was the design of novel S-protected thiolated hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC) and the assessment of its mucoadhesive properties and biodegradability compared to the corresponding unmodified polymer. Thiolated HEC was S-protected via disulfide bond formation between 6-mercaptonicotinamide (6-MNA) and the thiol substructures of the polymer. In vitro screening of mucoadhesive properties was accomplished using two different methods: rotating cylinder studies and viscosity measurements. Moreover, biodegradability of these polymers by cellulase, xylanase and lysozyme was evaluated. MTT and LDH assays were performed on Caco-2 cells to determine the cytotoxicity of S-protected thiolated HEC. Thiolated HEC displayed 280.09 +/- 1.70 mu mol of free thiol groups per gram polymer. S-protected thiolated HEC exhibiting 270.8 +/- 21.11 mu mol immobilized 6-MNA ligands per gram of polymer was shown being 2.4-fold more mucoadhesive compared to thiolated HEC. No mucoadhesion was observed in case of unmodified HEC. Results were in a good agreement with rheological studies. The presence of free thiol moieties likely caused lower degree of hydrolysis by xylanase, whereas the degradation by both enzymes cellulase and xylanase was more hampered when 6-MNA was introduced as ligand for thiol group's protection. Findings in cell viability revealed that all three conjugates were nontoxic. S-protection of thiolated hydroxyethyl cellulose improved mucoadhesive properties and provided pronounced stability towards enzymatic attack, that makes this excipient superior for non-invasive drug administration over thiolated and unmodified forms. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据