4.6 Review

Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Aging and Epigenetics

期刊

CANCERS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers12010103

关键词

acute myeloid leukemia (AML); aging; epigenetic; hematopoietic stem cell (HSC); clonal hematopoiesis (CH); mutation

类别

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG or German Research Foundation) [FOR2674, SFB1074]
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades (Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation, and University) [PGC2018-102049-B-I00, RYC2018-025979-I]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive hematological disorder mainly affecting people of older age. AML initiation is primarily attributed to mutations in crucial cellular regulators such as epigenetic factors, transcription factors, and signaling genes. AML's aggressiveness and responsiveness to treatment depends on the specific cell type where leukemia first arose. Aged hematopoietic cells are often genetically and/or epigenetically altered and, therefore, present with a completely different cellular context for AML development compared to young cells. In this review, we summarize key aspects of AML development, and we focus, in particular, on the contribution of cellular aging to leukemogenesis and on current treatment options for elderly AML patients. Hematological disorders and leukemia grow exponentially with age. So far, with conventional induction therapy, many elderly patients experience a very poor overall survival rate requiring substantial social and medical costs during the relatively few remaining months of life. The global population's age is increasing rapidly without an acceptable equal growth in therapeutic management of AML in the elderly; this is in sharp contrast to the increase in successful therapies for leukemia in younger patients. Therefore, a focus on the understanding of the biology of aging in the hematopoietic system, the development of appropriate research models, and new therapeutic approaches are urged.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据