4.6 Article

Organotypic slice culture model demonstrates inter-neuronal spreading of alpha-synuclein aggregates

期刊

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40478-019-0865-5

关键词

Alpha-synuclein; Prion-like spreading; Serine-129 phosphorylation; Organotypic slices

资金

  1. Lundbeck Foundation [R248-2016-2518, R223-2015-4222]
  2. Michael J Fox Foundation grant [12028.01]
  3. Cultural Affairs and Mission Sector, Ministry of Higher Education, Arab Republic of Egypt
  4. European Research Council [ERC CoG-724489]
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (Sinergia) [CRSII3_154461]
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [CRSII3_154461] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here we describe the use of an organotypic hippocampal slice model for studying alpha-synuclein aggregation and inter-neuronal spreading initiated by microinjection of pre-formed alpha-synuclein fibrils (PFFs). PFF injection at dentate gyrus (DG) templates the formation of endogenous alpha-synuclein aggregates in axons and cell bodies of this region that spread to CA3 and CA1 regions. Aggregates are insoluble and phosphorylated at serine-129, recapitulating Lewy pathology features found in Parkinson's disease and other synucleinopathies. The model was found to favor anterograde spreading of the aggregates. Furthermore, it allowed development of slices expressing only serine-129 phosphorylation-deficient human alpha-synuclein (S129G) using an adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector in alpha-synuclein knockout slices. The processes of aggregation and spreading of alpha-synuclein were thereby shown to be independent of phosphorylation at serine-129. We provide methods and highlight crucial steps for PFF microinjection and characterization of aggregate formation and spreading. Slices derived from genetically engineered mice or manipulated using viral vectors allow testing of hypotheses on mechanisms involved in the formation of alpha-synuclein aggregates and their prion-like spreading.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据