4.7 Article

First small-molecule PROTACs for G protein-coupled receptors: inducing α1A-adrenergic receptor degradation

期刊

ACTA PHARMACEUTICA SINICA B
卷 10, 期 9, 页码 1669-1679

出版社

INST MATERIA MEDICA, CHINESE ACAD MEDICAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.01.014

关键词

Small-molecule PROTACs; alpha(1A)-Adrenergie receptor; Ubiquitylation; Degradation; Prostate cancer

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21629201]
  2. Shandong Natural Science Foundation (China) [ZR2018ZC0233]
  3. Taishan Scholar Program at Shandong Province
  4. Qilu/Tang Scholar Program at Shandong University
  5. Major Project of Science and Technology of Shandong Province (China) [2015ZDJS04001]
  6. Key Research and Development Project of Shandong Province (China) [2017CXGC1401]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) are dual-functional hybrid molecules that can selectively recruit an E3 ubiquitin ligase to a target protein to direct the protein into the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS), thereby selectively reducing the target protein level by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Nowadays, small-molecule PROTACs are gaining popularity as tools to degrade pathogenic protein. Herein, we present the first small-molecule PROTACs that can induce the alpha(1A)-adrenergic receptor (alpha(1A)-AR) degradation, which is also the first small-molecule PROTACs for G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to our knowledge. These degradation inducers were developed through conjugation of known alpha(1)-adrenergic receptors (alpha(1)-ARs) inhibitor prazosin and cereblon (CRBN) ligand poma-lidomide through the different linkers. The representative compound 9c is proved to inhibit the proliferation of PC-3 cells and result in tumor growth regression, which highlighted the potential of our study as a new therapeutic strategy for prostate cancer. (C) 2020 Chinese Pharmaceutical Association and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据