4.6 Article

Association of Maximal Extent of Resection of Contrast-Enhanced and Non-Contrast-Enhanced Tumor With Survival Within Molecular Subgroups of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

期刊

JAMA ONCOLOGY
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 495-503

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.6143

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIH [R01CA52689, P50CA097257, R01CA126831, K08 12649025]
  2. Loglio Collective
  3. Stanley D. Lewis and Virginia S. Lewis Endowed Chair in Brain Tumor Research
  4. RobertMagnin Newman Endowed Chair in Neuro-oncology
  5. California Department of Public Health [103885]
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Program of Cancer Registries [5NU58DP006344]
  7. NCI's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program (UCSF) [HHSN261201800032I]
  8. University of Southern California [HHSN261201800015I]
  9. Public Health Institute, Cancer Registry of Greater California [HHSN261201800009I]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This multicenter cohort study assesses the association of maximal extent of resection of contrast-enhanced and non-contrast-enhanced tumor with survival among patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma in different molecular subgroups to develop a new road map for cytoreductive surgery. Question Is maximal extent of resection of non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced tumor associated with improved survival within molecularly defined subgroups of newly diagnosed glioblastoma? Findings In this cohort study of 761 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, maximal resection of contrast-enhanced plus non-contrast-enhanced tumor was found to be associated with increased overall survival in younger patients, whereas maximal resection of contrast-enhanced tumor was associated with increased overall survival in older patients, regardless of molecular subgroup. Meaning These findings indicate that maximal extent of resection of the contrast-enhanced tumor in all patients and the contrast-enhanced plus non-contrast-enhanced tumor in younger patients is associated with increased overall survival regardless of molecular subgroup and suggest a need to reconsider surgical strategies for these patients in the molecular era. Importance Per the World Health Organization 2016 integrative classification, newly diagnosed glioblastomas are separated into isocitrate dehydrogenase gene 1 or 2 (IDH)-wild-type and IDH-mutant subtypes, with median patient survival of 1.2 and 3.6 years, respectively. Although maximal resection of contrast-enhanced (CE) tumor is associated with longer survival, the prognostic importance of maximal resection within molecular subgroups and the potential importance of resection of non-contrast-enhanced (NCE) disease is poorly understood. Objective To assess the association of resection of CE and NCE tumors in conjunction with molecular and clinical information to develop a new road map for cytoreductive surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included a development cohort from the University of California, San Francisco (761 patients diagnosed from January 1, 1997, through December 31, 2017, with 9.6 years of follow-up) and validation cohorts from the Mayo Clinic (107 patients diagnosed from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2014, with 5.7 years of follow-up) and the Ohio Brain Tumor Study (99 patients with data collected from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2011, with a median follow-up of 10.9 months). Image accessors were blinded to patient groupings. Eligible patients underwent surgical resection for newly diagnosed glioblastoma and had available survival, molecular, and clinical data and preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance images. Data were analyzed from November 15, 2018, to March 15, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures Overall survival. Results Among the 761 patients included in the development cohort (468 [61.5%] men; median age, 60 [interquartile range, 51.6-67.7] years), younger patients with IDH-wild-type tumors and aggressive resection of CE and NCE tumors had survival similar to that of patients with IDH-mutant tumors (median overall survival [OS], 37.3 [95% CI, 31.6-70.7] months). Younger patients with IDH-wild-type tumors and reduction of CE tumor but residual NCE tumors fared worse (median OS, 16.5 [95% CI, 14.7-18.3] months). Older patients with IDH-wild-type tumors benefited from reduction of CE tumor (median OS, 12.4 [95% CI, 11.4-14.0] months). The results were validated in the 2 external cohorts. The association between aggressive CE and NCE in patients with IDH-wild-type tumors was not attenuated by the methylation status of the promoter region of the DNA repair enzyme O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase. Conclusions and Relevance This study confirms an association between maximal resection of CE tumor and OS in patients with glioblastoma across all subgroups. In addition, maximal resection of NCE tumor was associated with longer OS in younger patients, regardless of IDH status, and among patients with IDH-wild-type glioblastoma regardless of the methylation status of the promoter region of the DNA repair enzyme O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase. These conclusions may help reassess surgical strategies for individual patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据