4.5 Article

Safety of bacteriophage therapy in severe Staphylococcus aureus infection

期刊

NATURE MICROBIOLOGY
卷 5, 期 3, 页码 465-472

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41564-019-0634-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Westmead Research Hub
  2. Cancer Institute New South Wales
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council
  4. Ian Potter Foundation
  5. National Health and Medical Research Council (Australian Government)
  6. ABPH
  7. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [1104232, 1107322]
  8. AmpliPhi Biosciences Corporation
  9. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1107322, 1104232] Funding Source: NHMRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this single-arm non-comparative trial, 13 patients in an Australian hospital with severe Staphylococcus aureus infections were intravenously administered a good manufacturing practice-quality preparation of three Myoviridae bacteriophages (AB-SA01) as adjunctive therapy. AB-SA01 was intravenously administered twice daily for 14 d and the clinical, haematological and blood biochemical parameters of the recipients were monitored for 90 d. The primary outcome was the assessment of safety and tolerability (that is, pain and redness at the infusion site and systemic adverse reactions, such as fever, tachycardia, hypotension, diarrhoea or abdominal pain and the development of renal or hepatic dysfunction). No adverse reactions were reported, and our data indicate that AB-SA01 administered in this way is safe in severe S. aureus infections, including infective endocarditis and septic shock. Future controlled trials will be needed to determine the efficacy of AB-SA01 but no phage resistance evolved in vivo and the measurements of bacterial and phage kinetics in blood samples suggest that 12 h dosing of 10(9) plaque-forming units may be a rational basis for further studies. An observational human clinical trial using a bacteriophage preparation showed that it was well tolerated without major adverse events in human patients with Staphylococcus aureus septicaemia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据