4.7 Article

Sustainable subway indoor air quality monitoring and fault-tolerant ventilation control using a sparse autoencoder-driven sensor self-validation

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 52, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101847

关键词

Fault-tolerant ventilation control; Sensor self-validation; Sparse autoencoder; Subway transportation systems; IAQ monitoring

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) [NRF-2017R1E1A1A03070713]
  2. Railway Technology Research Project of the Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport [19QPPW-B152307-01]
  3. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA) [152307] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sensors providing measurements for monitoring and control of indoor air quality (IAQ) are key components of the ventilation systems in subway stations. However, faulty sensors due to harsh ambient conditions may deliver incorrect information triggering misinterpretation; causing energy waste or IAQ deterioration. This paper presents a holistic online framework for sensor self-validation in a subway station based on a sparse autoencoder (AE) architecture. The sensor self-validation procedure consists of sensor fault detection, faulty sensor identification, and faulty sensor reconstruction. First, the AE-based detection rate between 44% and 100%. Then, the faulty sensor identification was conducted through an AE-sensor validity index (SVI AE ). The faulty sensor reconstruction was conducted by the AE structure and evaluated with several performance metrics. Finally, the sustainability and fault-tolerance aspects of this framework were verified through mathematical modeling of the ventilation system; showing the effects of the faulty and reconstructed sensors on energy consumption and public health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据