4.7 Article

Preparation, characterization, and thermal conductivity of polyvinyl-formaldehyde/MWCNTs foam: A low cost heat sink substrate

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.01.044

关键词

PVF foam; MWCNTs; Heat sink; Thermal conductivity; Heat dissipation

资金

  1. Science and Technology Development Fund (STDF), Egypt [25610]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Preparation of polyvinyl-formaldehyde (PVF)/multi walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) foams as an efficient heat sink nanocomposites was presented here. The PVF foam was loaded with 1 wt%, 2 wt%, and 4 wt% of MWCNTs. Thermal conductivity of the PVF/MWCNTs foams are investigated within the temperature range 25-200 degrees C. The structure of the prepared foams were characterized by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), Raman spectroscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The results show that the MWCNTs are homogeneously distributed inside the PVF foam and attached to the PVF matrix via van der Waals forces. The addition of the MWCNTs increased the thermal stability of the PVF foam through connecting and filling the pores of the PVF foam. The maximum thermal conductivity value was found to be approximate to 5 W/mK for 4 wt% of PVF/MWCNTs foam at room temperature. This value is 166 times higher than the thermal conductivity of neat PVF foam. In addition, this value is higher than that of the previously published values for many carbon nanomaterials (CNMs)/polymer nanocompsites heat sinks. The thermal conductivity of the 4 wt% of PVF/MWCNTs reached 65 W/mK at 200 degrees C. The 4 wt% PVF/MWCNTs foam lowered the temperature of a hot surface from approximate to 40 to 30 degrees C, leading to cooling efficiency of 40%. Based on the experimental results, the PVF/MWCNTs foams show an improved capability for heat dissipation through easily and scalable preparation method. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据