4.6 Article

Insignificant QBO-MJO Prediction Skill Relationship in the SubX and S2S Subseasonal Reforecasts

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
卷 124, 期 23, 页码 12655-12666

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2019JD031416

关键词

Madden-Julian oscillation; quasi-biennial oscillation; prediction

资金

  1. NSF [AGS-1652289, AGS-1543932]
  2. NOAA [NA16OAR4310070]
  3. KMA RD Program [KMI2018-03110]
  4. NOAA's Climate Program Office (CPO) Modeling, Analysis, Predictions, and Projections (MAPP) program
  5. Regional and Global Model Analysis component of the Earth and Environmental System Modeling Program of the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research [NSF IA 1844590]
  6. NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship Program [80NSSC18K1347]
  7. NCAR - NSF [1852977]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The impact of the stratospheric quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) on the prediction of the tropospheric Madden-Julian oscillation (MJO) is evaluated in reforecasts from nine models participating in subseasonal prediction projects, including the Subseasonal Experiment (SubX) and Subseasonal to Seasonal (S2S) projects. When MJO prediction skill is analyzed for December to February, MJO prediction skill is higher in the easterly phase of the QBO than the westerly phase, consistent with previous studies. However, the relationship between QBO phase and MJO prediction skill is not statistically significant for most models. This insignificant QBO-MJO skill relationship is further confirmed by comparing two subseasonal reforecast experiments with the Community Earth System Model v1 using both a high-top (46-level) and low-top (30-level) version of the Community Atmosphere Model v5. While there are clear differences in the forecasted QBO between the two model top configurations, a negligible change is shown in the MJO prediction, indicating that the QBO in this model may not directly control the MJO prediction and supporting the insignificant QBO-MJO skill relationship found in SubX and S2S models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据