4.8 Article

Therapeutic Efficacy of Cancer Stem Cell Vaccines in the Adjuvant Setting

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 76, 期 16, 页码 4661-4672

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-2664

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCATS NIH HHS [UL1 TR000433] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA046592, R35 CA197585] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDCR NIH HHS [R56 DE024385] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccine strategies aimed at targeting cancer stem-like cells (CSC) may be most efficacious if deployed in the adjuvant setting. In this study, we offer preclinical evidence that this is the case for a CSC-DC vaccine as tested in murine models of SCC7 squamous cell cancer and D5 melanoma. Vaccination of mice with an ALDH(high) SCC7 CSC-DC vaccine after surgical excision of established SCC7 tumors reduced local tumor relapse and prolonged host survival. This effect was augmented significantly by simultaneous administration of anti-PD-L1, an immune checkpoint inhibitor. In the minimal disease setting of D5 melanoma, treatment of mice with ALDH(high) CSC-DC vaccination inhibited primary tumor growth, reduced spontaneous lung metastases, and increased host survival. In this setting, CCR10 and its ligands were downregulated on ALDH(high) D5 CSCs and in lung tissues, respectively, after vaccination with ALDH(high) D5 CSC-DC. RNAi-mediated attenuation of CCR10 blocked tumor cell migration in vitro and metastasis in vivo. T cells harvested from mice vaccinated with ALDH(high) D5 CSC-DC selectively killed ALDH(high) D5 CSCs, with additional evidence of humoral immunologic engagement and a reduction in ALDH(high) cells in residual tumors. Overall, our results offered a preclinical proof of concept for the use of ALDH(high) CSC-DC vaccines in the adjuvant setting to more effectively limit local tumor recurrence and spontaneous pulmonary metastasis, as compared with traditional DC vaccines, with increased host survival further accentuated by simultaneous PD-L1 blockade. (C) 2016 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据