4.6 Article

Virulence Constitution of Multi-Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Upper Egypt

期刊

INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 587-595

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S233694

关键词

P. aeruginosa; virulence; exoU; MDR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) is a major health-care problem. In this study, we explored the epidemiology of virulence determinants amongmulti-drug-resistant (MDR) clinical P. aeruginosa isolates fromhospitalized patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care units in Upper Egypt. Patients and Methods: MDR P. aeruginosa isolates were screened for the presence of eight virulence factors and typed by ERIC-PCR. Results: A total of 39 clinical MDR isolates were selected out of 173 isolated P. aeruginosa showing a combination of adhesion and cytotoxicity virulence patterns, with the detection of aprA, exoU, exoS, lasB, algD, toxA in 74.3%, 58.9%, 46.1%, 41.2%, 30.7%, 20.5% of the isolates, respectively. The MDR isolates were grouped into 13 different virulence profiles according to the pattern of virulence gene distribution. exoU genotype was more predominant among the P. aeruginosa isolates with more than 48% of the isolates harboring this gene alone, 7% harboring both exoU and exoS and 43.5% harboring exoS gene. An intermediate degree of diversity was detected by ERIC-PCR typing where the isolates were clustered in 7 major groups, indicating possible cross-infection within the hospital. Conclusion: Our results highlight the increased frequency of virulent P. aeruginosa isolates with a shift to the more virulent cytotoxic exoU genotype. Further hospital infection-control measures are mandatory to control the hospital cross-transmission of these highly virulent isolates. This study could vastly be a help to develop efficient treatment policies against P. aeruginosa induced ventilator-associated pneumonia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据