4.6 Article

Assessing the Relationship Between Gut Microbiota and Bone Mineral Density

期刊

FRONTIERS IN GENETICS
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00006

关键词

gut microbiota; bone mineral density; polygenic risk score; osteoporosis; fracture

资金

  1. National Natural Scientific Foundation of China [81673112, 2016YFE0119100]
  2. Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2017JZ024]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. MRC [MC_PC_12028] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Recent study demonstrates the comprehensive effects of gut microbiota on complex diseases or traits. However, limited effort has been conducted to explore the potential relationships between gut microbiota and BMD. Methods We performed a polygenetic risk scoring (PRS) analysis to systematically explore the relationships between gut microbiota and body BMD. Significant SNP sets associated with gut microbiota were derived from previous genome-wide association study (GWAS). In total, 2,294 to 5,065 individuals with BMD values of different sites and their genotype data were obtained from UK Biobank cohort. The gut microbiota PRS of each individual was computed from the SNP genotype data for each study subject of UK Biobank by PLINK software. Using computed PRS as the instrumental variables of gut microbiota, Pearson correlation analysis of individual PRS values and BMD values was finally conducted to test the potential association between gut microbiota and target trait. Results In total, 31 BMD traits were selected as outcome to assess their relationships with gut microbiota. After adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and the first 5 principal components (PCs) as the covariates using linear regression model, pelvis BMD (P = 0.0437) showed suggestive association signal with gut microbiota after multiple testing correction. Conclusion Our study findings support the weak relevance of gut microbiota with the development of BMD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据