4.7 Article

1D to 3D multi-stable architected materials with zero Poisson's ratio and controllable thermal expansion

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 188, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108430

关键词

Mechanical metamaterial; Negative stiffness; Zero Poisson's ratio; Shape-reconfiguration; Tunable thermal expansion

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11672085]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multi-stable mechanical metamaterials with unprecedented mechanical/physical properties have attracted great interests due to their functional applications for advanced materials and devices. However, the original curved/tilted bistable snapping segments in most of those existing multi-stable mechanical metamaterials cause unequal bistability/multi-stability. The relative thicker supporting segments can't provide complete constraints at the end of snapping segments using single parent material. To achieve completely symmetric bistable/multi-stable mechanism, an innovative design strategy is proposed based on interlocking assembly method with multimaterials and compressed buckled snapping segments for bistable units. Theoretical analysis, numerical simulations and experimental verifications are used to show completely symmetric bistability/multi-stability with negative stiffness. The multi-stable mechanical metamaterials have robust shape-reconfigurability and zero Poisson's ratio with large recoverable deformation. Geometric and material gradients design are carried out to control deterministic deformation sequence with rich programmability. Theoretical and numerical results reveal that tunable ID to 3D large positive/zero/negative isotropic or anisotropic thermal expansions of single 1D to 3D multi-stable metamaterials can be achieved, respectively. This work suggests the rational designed metamaterials with multi-abnormal-index and the potential applications of multi-functional metamaterials. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据