4.7 Article

Novel design of a coral-like open-cell porous degradable magnesium implant for orthopaedic application

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 188, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108474

关键词

Open-cell porous Mg alloys; Continuum damage mechanics; Biodegradation model; Finite element simulation; X-ray computed tomography; In-vivo rabbit model

资金

  1. Research Committee of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University [G-YBRL]
  2. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [511511]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to use degradation prediction and in-vivo evaluation to inspire a novel design of magnesium (Mg) implant having a coral-like open-cell porous interior and an outer solid casing. In this design, the porous interior acts as a bone-mimic channel for tissue infiltration and cell adhesion, while the solid casing enables better structural strength and integrity. Different porosities of porous interiors, combined with different wall thicknesses of outer casing, were designed. By implementing a continuum damage mechanics (CDM)-based biodegradation model into finite element simulations, the mechanical properties and degradation rates of the implant were predicted. The results showed that the implant with 70%-75% porosity and 0.5 mm wall thickness had the optimal structural strength and degradation rate. This implant structure was then fabricated. Compression tests and X-ray computed tomography (CT) scanning were carried out to investigate the material properties and the structural transformation of the implants respectively. Moreover, an in-vivo rabbit model was used to evaluate the degradation behaviours of the implant at different time points. The results showed that this novel Mg implant had a relatively sturdy material strength and the porous structure did benefit the ingrowth of bone tissue and expedite the healing process. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据