4.8 Article

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Base Station (UAV-BS) Deployment With Millimeter-Wave Beamforming

期刊

IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 1336-1349

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2954620

关键词

Achievable sum rate; artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm; beamforming; deployment; millimeter-wave (mmWave) communications; unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) communications

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61571025, 91538204, 61827901, 91738301, 61922010]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0503002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) with flexible mobility and low cost has been a promising technology for wireless communication. Thus, it can be used for wireless data collection in Internet of Things (IoT). In this article, we consider millimeter-wave (mmWave) communication on a UAV platform, where the UAV base station (UAV-BS) serves multiple ground users, which generate big sensor data. Both the deployment of the UAV-BS and the beamforming design have essential impact on the throughput of the system. Thus, we formulate a problem to maximize the achievable sum rate of all the users, subject to a minimum rate constraint for each user, a position constraint of the UAV-BS, and a constant-modulus (CM) constraint for the beamforming vector. We solve the nonconvex problem with two steps. First, by introducing the approximate beam pattern, we solve the deployment and beam gain allocation subproblem. Then, we utilize the artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm to solve the beamforming subproblem. For the global optimization problem, we find the near-optimal position of the UAV-BS and the beamforming vector to steer toward each user, subject to an analog beamforming structure. The simulation results demonstrate that the proposed solution can achieve a more superior performance than the present random steering beamforming strategy in terms of achievable sum rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据