4.7 Article

Multilevel thresholding by fuzzy type II sets using evolutionary algorithms

期刊

SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION
卷 51, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2019.100591

关键词

Type II fuzzy entropy; Backtracking search algoritmm; Salp Swarm Algorithm; Multilevel thresholding

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The image segmentation based on Multilevel thresholding has attracted more attention in recent years, they have been used in different applications. Therefore, several evolutionary computation methods have been proposed to determine the optimal threshold values. However, these approaches suffer from some limitations such as the stagnation point which leads to degradation the quality of the segmented image. In addition, most of them used either Otsu or Kapur as a fitness function, and the complexity of these methods is increased with increasing the threshold levels. Moreover, they don't provide accurate results in all the cases. To overcome such situations, in this paper is proposed the use of evolutionary computation algorithms combined with the Type II Fuzzy Entropy as the objective function. Such methods are the Backtracking Search Optimization Algorithm (BSA) and the Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSA). The BSA and SSA are able to avoid the limitation of similar techniques for image threshold because the objective function removes the ambiguities helping to find more accurate results. The BSA and SSA are used to find the best parameters of the Type II Fuzzy Entropy that extracts the optimal thresholds that properly segment the histogram of a digital image. To evaluate the performance of the proposed two methods, a set of experiments are performed using a set of benchmark images which have different characteristics. Moreover, the experiments are also performed over medical images from blood cells. The experimental results indicate that the proposed two methods have a good performance. However, they provide better performance than other algorithms in terms of quality and accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据