4.7 Article

Probing quantum optical excitations with fast electrons

期刊

OPTICA
卷 6, 期 12, 页码 1524-1534

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OPTICA.6.001524

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [MAT2017-88492-R, SEV2015-0522]
  2. European Research Council [789104-eNANO]
  3. Catalan CERCA (CERCA)
  4. Fundacion Cellex (Fundacio Privada Cellex)
  5. H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (COFUND-DP, H2020-MSCA-COFUND-2014) [665884]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Probing optical excitations with nanometer resolution is important for understanding their dynamics and interactions down to the atomic scale. Electron microscopes currently offer the unparalleled ability of rendering spatially resolved electron spectra with combined meV and sub-nm resolution, while the use of ultrafast optical pulses enables fs temporal resolution and exposure of the electrons to ultraintense confined optical fields. Here, we theoretically investigate fundamental aspects of the interaction of fast electrons with localized optical modes that are made possible by these advances. We use a quantum optics description of the optical field to predict that the resulting electron spectra strongly depend on the statistics of the sample excitations (bosonic or fermionic) and their population (Fock, coherent, or thermal), whose autocorrelation functions are directly retrieved from the ratios of electron gain intensities. We further explore feasible experimental scenarios to probe the quantum characteristics of the sampled excitations and their populations. In particular, we present realistic simulations for electron beams interacting with optical cavities infiltrated with optically pumped quantum emitters, which we show to undergo a varied temporal evolution in the cavity mode statistics that causes radical modifications in the transmitted electron spectra depending on pump-electron delay. (c) 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据