4.6 Article

A Combination of Feature Selection and Random Forest Techniques to Solve a Problem Related to Blast-Induced Ground Vibration

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app10030869

关键词

ground vibration; prediction; machine learning; feature selection; environmental issue of blasting

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation Project of China [41807259]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Safety and Health for Metal Mines [2017-JSKSSYS-04]
  3. Project of Changsha Science and Technology Project [kc1809012]
  4. Project for the Hunan Social Science Results Review Committee [XSP18YBC343]
  5. Innovation-Driven Project of Central South University [2020CX040]
  6. Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province, China [18A381, 18A295]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In mining and civil engineering applications, a reliable and proper analysis of ground vibration due to quarry blasting is an extremely important task. While advances in machine learning led to numerous powerful regression models, the usefulness of these models for modeling the peak particle velocity (PPV) remains largely unexplored. Using an extensive database comprising quarry site datasets enriched with vibration variables, this article compares the predictive performance of five selected machine learning classifiers, including classification and regression trees (CART), chi-squared automatic interaction detection (CHAID), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), and support vector machine (SVM) for PPV analysis. Before conducting these model developments, feature selection was applied in order to select the most important input parameters for PPV. The results of this study show that RF performed substantially better than any of the other investigated regression models, including the frequently used SVM and ANN models. The results and process analysis of this study can be utilized by other researchers/designers in similar fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据