4.6 Article

Numerical Study of an Ultra-Broadband All-Silicon Terahertz Absorber

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app10020436

关键词

broadband absorption; all-silicon terahertz absorber; electric and magnetic resonances

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61875251, 61875179, 11874332]
  2. Public project of Zhejiang Province [LGG18F050003]
  3. National major scientific research instrument development project of Natural Science Foundation of China [61727816]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article we present and numerically investigate a broadband all-silicon terahertz (THz) absorber which consists of a single-layer periodic array of a diamond metamaterial layer placed on a silicon substrate. We simulated the absorption spectra of the absorber under different structural parameters using the commercial software Lumerical FDTD solutions, and analyzed the absorption mechanism from the distribution of the electromagnetic fields. Finally, the absorption for both transverse electric (TE) and transverse magnetic (TM) polarizations under different incident angles from 0 to 70 degrees were investigated. Herein, electric and magnetic resonances are proposed that result in perfect broadband absorption. When the absorber meets the impedance matching principle in accordance with the loss mechanism, it can achieve a nearly perfect absorption response. The diamond absorber exhibits an absorption of similar to 100% at 1 THz and achieves an absorption efficiency >90% within a bandwidth of 1.3 THz. In addition, owing to the highly structural symmetry, the absorber has a polarization-independent characteristic. Compared with previous metal-dielectric-metal sandwiched absorbers, the all-silicon metamaterial absorbers can avoid the disadvantages of high ohmic losses, low melting points, and high thermal conductivity of the metal, which ensure a promising future for optical applications, including sensors, modulators, and photoelectric detection devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据