4.6 Article

Experimental Investigation and Optimal 3D Bioprinting Parameters of SA-Gel Porous Cartilage Scaffold

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app10030768

关键词

biological 3D printing; sodium alginate; gelatin; cartilage scaffold

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51805475, 51675148, 51275141, 51305113]
  2. Key Discipline of The Ocean Techtronic Equipment's Technology
  3. Nature Science Foundation of Zhejiang Provinces Technology 101 [51475129]
  4. 3D assembly of complex biological structure [LY14E050026]
  5. Zhejiang Province Higher Visiting Scholar project Technology 101 [51475129]
  6. Malaysia's Ministry of Higher Education [DIP-2017-001]
  7. Outstanding Young Teachers Fund of Hangzhou Dianzi University [GK160203201002/003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main aim of this paper is to achieve the suitable SA-GEL (sodium alginate and gelatin) porous cartilage scaffold by 3D printing technology with optimal prediction parameters. Firstly, the characteristics of SA-GEL were analyzed, the influence of calcium chloride on the gel was explored, and the optimal cross-linking concentration and gelation temperature were determined. Secondly, a prediction model of the extrusion line width of SA-GEL was established, in which the printing pressure, the moving speed of the needle and the fiber interval were the important parameters affecting the printing performance of the SA-GEL composite material. Thirdly, the SA-GEL composite scaffolds were printed on the Bio-plotter platform, the C5.18 chondrocytes cells were cultured in the SA-GEL biomaterial scaffold, and the results show that the cells could survive well. These results show that, under the control of the printing parameters pressure 1.8 bar, moving speed 10.7 mm/s and the internal structure parameters of the scaffold is 0/45-1.2 (Printing interval: 1.2 mm, angle value: 45 degree), SA-GEL scaffold printing results can be obtained which have good mechanical properties and biocompatibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据