4.8 Article

Noninterference Revealing of Layered to Layered Zinc Storage Mechanism of δ-MnO2 toward Neutral Zn-Mn Batteries with Superior Performance

期刊

ADVANCED SCIENCE
卷 7, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.201902795

关键词

aqueous neutral Zn-MnO2 batteries; delta-MnO2; quasi-solid-state batteries; zinc storage mechanism; Zn-Mn batteries

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51872104, 51672205, 51972257]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFA0202602]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2018CFB581]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MnO2 is one of the most studied cathodes for aqueous neutral zinc-ion batteries. However, the diverse reported crystal structures of MnO2 compared to delta-MnO2 inevitably suffer a structural phase transition from tunneled to layered Zn-buserite during the initial cycles, which is not as kinetically direct as the conventional intercalation electrochemistry in layered materials and thus poses great challenges to the performance and multifunctionality of devices. Here, a binder-free delta-MnO2 cathode is designed and a favorable layered to layered Zn2+ storage mechanism is revealed systematically using such a noninterferencing electrode platform in combination with ab initio calculation. A flexible quasi-solid-state Zn-Mn battery with an electrodeposited flexible Zn anode is further assembled, exhibiting high energy density (35.11 mWh cm(-3); 432.05 Wh kg(-1)), high power density (676.92 mW cm(-3); 8.33 kW kg(-1)), extremely low self-discharge rate, and ultralong stability up to 10 000 cycles. Even with a relatively high delta-MnO2 mass loading of 5 mg cm(-2), significant energy and power densities are still achieved. The device also works well over a broad temperature range (0-40 degrees C) and can efficiently power different types of small electronics. This work provides an opportunity to develop high-performance multivalent-ion batteries via the design of a kinetically favorable host structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据