3.8 Article

Three-Dimensional Spheroid Culture on Polymer-Coated Surface Potentiate Stem Cell Functions via Enhanced Cell-Extracellular Matrix Interactions

期刊

ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 2240-2250

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01738

关键词

human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs); initiated chemical vapor deposition (iCVD); 3D culture; extracellular matrix (ECM); angiogenic efficacy; differentiation capabilities

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government [NRF-2017R1A2B3007806, NRF-2015M3A9B3028685]
  2. KAIST Institute for the NanoCentury

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aggregation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into three-dimensional (3D) spheroids has emerged as a promising therapeutic candidate for the treatment of a variety of diseases. In spite of the numerous 3D culture methods suggested recently for MSC spheroid generation, it is still elusive to fully reflect real stem cell niches; this effort majorly suffers from a lack of cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions within the 3D spheroids. In this study, we develop a simple but versatile method for generating human MSC (hMSC) spheroids by culturing the cells on a functional polymer film surface, poly(2,4,6,8-tetravinyl-2,4,6,8-tetramethyl cyclotetrasiloxane) (pV4D4). Interestingly, the pV4D4-coated surface allows a dynamic cell adhesion to the polymer surface while developing the formation of 3D spheroids. The corresponding mechanotransduction promotes the expression of the endogenous ECM and, in turn, results in a remarkable improvement in self-renewal abilities, pro-angiogenic potency, and multilineage differentiation capabilities. This observation highlights the significance of our method compared to the conventional spheroid-generating methods in terms of recreating the ECM-rich microenvironment. We believe the developed surface can serve as a versatile but reliable method for stem cell-based tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据