4.4 Article

World Octopus Fisheries

期刊

REVIEWS IN FISHERIES SCIENCE & AQUACULTURE
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 279-429

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/23308249.2019.1680603

关键词

Octopus; fisheries; review; global

资金

  1. Japan Science and Technology Agency [J130000263, AS2715164U]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Education and Culture [PRX17/00090]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (OCTOSET project) [RTI2018-097908-B-I00]
  4. Direccio General de Pesca i Afers Mar~itims, Generalitat de Catalunya
  5. MINECO [BES-2013-063551]
  6. Irish Research Council - Government of Ireland Postdoctoral Fellowship [GOIPD/2019/460]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have shown a global increase in coastal and shelf cephalopod populations, with octopus production steadily rising over the past three decades. Octopus fisheries are expected to continue growing in importance due to the overexploitation of many finfish stocks, and there is a need for effective management and conservation measures to protect cephalopod resources.
Recent studies have shown that coastal and shelf cephalopod populations have increased globally over the last six decades. Although cephalopod landings are dominated by the squid fishery, which represents nearly 80% of the worldwide cephalopod catches, octopuses and cuttlefishes represent similar to 10% each. Total reported global production of octopuses over the past three decades indicates a relatively steady increase in catch, almost doubling from 179,042 t in 1980 to 355,239 t in 2014. Octopus fisheries are likely to continue to grow in importance and magnitude as many finfish stocks are either fully or over-exploited. More than twenty described octopus species are harvested from some 90 countries worldwide. The current review describes the major octopus fisheries around the globe, providing an overview of species targeted, ecological and biological features of exploited stocks, catches and the key aspects of management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据