4.7 Review

Electrospun Functional Materials toward Food Packaging Applications: A Review

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano10010150

关键词

electrospinning; food packaging; functional membrane; nanofibers

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51803093, 51903123]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20180770, BK20190760]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  4. Opening Project of Division of Chemistry from Qingdao University of Science and Technology [QUSTHX201921]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrospinning is an effective and versatile method to prepare continuous polymer nanofibers and nonwovens that exhibit excellent properties such as high molecular orientation, high porosity and large specific surface area. Benefitting from these outstanding and intriguing features, electrospun nanofibers have been employed as a promising candidate for the fabrication of food packaging materials. Actually, the electrospun nanofibers used in food packaging must possess biocompatibility and low toxicity. In addition, in order to maintain the quality of food and extend its shelf life, food packaging materials also need to have certain functionality. Herein, in this timely review, functional materials produced from electrospinning toward food packaging are highlighted. At first, various strategies for the preparation of polymer electrospun fiber are introduced, then the characteristics of different packaging films and their successful applications in food packaging are summarized, including degradable materials, superhydrophobic materials, edible materials, antibacterial materials and high barrier materials. Finally, the future perspective and key challenges of polymer electrospun nanofibers for food packaging are also discussed. Hopefully, this review would provide a fundamental insight into the development of electrospun functional materials with high performance for food packaging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据