4.7 Article

PET and Active Coating Based on a LDH Nanofiller Hosting p-Hydroxybenzoate and Food-Grade Zeolites: Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity of Packaging and Shelf Life of Red Meat

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano9121727

关键词

layered double hydroxides; zeolites; active coating; antimicrobial; food packaging

资金

  1. Project Prin 2017 MultIFunctional poLymer cOmposites based on groWn matERials (MI-FLOWER) from the Italian Ministry of Education University and Research Project High-Performing Advanced Material Platform for Active and Intelligent Food Packaging Cronog [2017B7MMJ5_001, 783696]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Layered double hydroxide (LDH) nanofillers were considered as hosts of p-hydroxybenzoate as an antimicrobial molecule for active coating. A food grade resin with LDH-p-hydroxybenzoate and two different types of food grade zeolites was used to prepare active coatings for Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) trays. The release kinetics of the active molecule were followed using UV spectrophotometry and the experimental results were analyzed with the Gallagher-Corrigan model. The thermal properties of the coating mixtures and the PET coating were analyzed and found to be dependent on the coating's composition. On the basis of CO2 transmission rate and off-odors tests, the best coating composition was selected. Global migration in ethanol (10% v/v), acetic acid (3% w/v), and vegetable oil, and specific migration of p-hydroxybenzoic acid revealed the suitability of the material for food contact. Antimicrobial tests on the packaging demonstrated a good inhibition against Salmonella spp. and Campylobacter jejuni. Red meat was packed into the selected active materials and results were compared to uncoated PET packaging. Color tests (browning of the meat) and analysis of Enterobacteriaceae spp. and total viable count evolution up to 10 days of storage demonstrated the capability of the considered active packaging in prolonging the shelf life of red meat.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据